Education currently refers to the process deemed appropriate by society and governmental agencies in which students progress grade by grade or year by year through elementary, secondary and post-secondary academic pursuits. Interestingly enough, there seems to be little consensus on what the definition of education actually is between state and federal government agencies. As standardized testing has become key to the acquisition of government funding for public schools it appears that individual states and school districts are restructuring curriculums in secondary school content areas such as mathematics in order to target the acquisition of specific math skills without regard for the need for a natural progression of math content areas that will ensure content mastery within an overall program. I refer to a decision by one of my school districts to focus on algebra skills by teaching only algebra 1 and 2 and removing pre-algebra from the curriculum. It seems to me that pre-algebra is logically very useful and a helpful precursor to the more advanced courses. This is the shape of one facet of the educational process.
It seems that a wiser approach to achieving high levels of overall educational success is to consider the needs and abilities of the learner. What skills does the learner bring to the table and what needs? Once these are assessed, curriculum can be presented and modified according to the strengths and weaknesses of the individual students. The greatest challenge with this strategy is that it places a great deal of responsibility upon both the teacher and the students to work together in the learning process. The teacher must be able to actively gauge the intake of information by their students in terms of quantity and levels of difficulty and to make allowances for reflection and review when difficult topics are encountered and for increasing the pace of instruction when students have achieved sufficient mastery of the content under consideration. Regular feedback is essential on an individual basis by the teacher to foster the maximization of engagement by each student in a content area. This helps to ensure a balance of high levels of self-esteem and confidence as the student has concrete evidence that he or she has fulfilled the requirements for mastery of content material.
By these descriptions it seems that education and learning appear to be somewhat different. Education is the process as deemed appropriate by the educational system set in place “from above” so to speak while learning is the actual activity of a student becoming proficient in skills and knowledgeable about a content area on an individual basis. From the point of view of a skilled instructor, it seems irresponsible to rely wholly upon the dictates of components of standardized testing to achieve both the goals of the educational system and the needs of the learner. Some form of compromise is needed in order to allow for the maximization of learning.
